| |
Philadelphia Inquirer Editorial: Openly challenged
It's tough to stand out as a stubbornly backward government in South Jersey, what with the Delaware River Port Authority constantly raising the bar. But darned if Gloucester County didn't find a way.
The county freeholders have proven themselves so incapable of obeying the state's open-meetings law that they require a babysitter.
State Superior Court Judge Francis J. Orlando Jr. recently imposed six months of independent monitoring on the board to make sure it breaks its habit of doing the public's business in private.
He found that the freeholders had been unable to explain why they took action behind closed doors on county jobs, salaries, spending, policy, and more.
The ruling stems from a 2008 lawsuit against the all-Democratic board brought by David Burnett, a former member of the county's Republican executive committee. Burnett alleged that the furtive freeholders had violated the Open Public Meetings Act about 60 times in two years.
Subsequent revelations suggest he wasn't very far off. Later that year, Orlando invalidated the creation of a superintendent of elections post because the freeholders had discussed it in private. This year, the judge voided a $21,600 workers' compensation settlement that the board approved in closed session.
Also this year, an appellate court squashed the freeholders' attempt to deny access to public records on the grounds that they were being kept off county premises.
And here's one more sign that county officials aren't serious about open government: They argued that they had addressed the compliance problem by appointing a monitor from Parker McCay - the very firm defending them against the open-meetings lawsuit.
Lately, county officials have been emphasizing their strenuous efforts to keep abreast of a "constantly evolving," "ever-changing landscape" of transparency laws in New Jersey. That's hogwash.
The Open Public Meetings Act was enacted in 1975, and it's about as straightforward as its title. It says government bodies must take all actions in public. The same goes for most of their discussions, with a few narrow exceptions for confidential matters such as litigation, labor negotiations, and real estate transactions.
The Open Public Records Act, which has been in place for nearly a decade, requires a similar presumption about government documents: With a few exceptions, they are open to the public.
The Gloucester County freeholders' inability to understand the letter and spirit of these laws is troubling - especially given that the freeholder director, Stephen Sweeney, also leads the state Senate. And the assignment of a judicial chaperone to keep tabs on them can only be seen as an embarrassing rebuke.
This would be a good time for Sweeney and company to make a convincing statement of their enthusiasm for open government going forward - preferably in public.
Read more: http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20100807_Editorial__Openly_challenged.html#ixzz0w7sntLdB
Watch sports videos you won't find anywhere else
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sweeney on the Hot Seat in Gloucester County
GOP takes dual-office holding party boss to task over independent monitor in Gloucester County
Woodbury, August 7, 2010 - Proving beyond the shadow of a doubt that its Republicans - not Democrats - who are on offense in the Gloucester County Freeholder race, GOP candidate Larry Wallace took dual-office holding party boss Steve Sweeney to task in front of the television cameras Wednesday night over who should be held accountable for the unprecedented appointment of an independent judicial monitor to oversee Gloucester County government due to repeated violations of the open public meetings act.
"Someone must be held accountable for this fiasco," said Wallace. "Either Mr. Sweeney and his colleagues got awful legal advice and its time to fire the county's chief legal counsel or, as we have been saying for months, Mr. Sweeney is just flat-out incapable of handling both the Senate Presidency and his responsibilities as Freeholder Director. If that's the case, he should immediately resign his county post and stop short-changing the taxpayers of Gloucester County."
More Coverage:
|
Click here now to sign up!
|
|
